H ?
«
‹
←
→
›
»
Language peer sets for SYNTOL: France↑ France/1960↑ Designed 1960 ↑ 1960s languages ↑ Second generation↑ Early Cold War↑ Genus Description languages ↑ Specialised Languages ↑ Description languages↑ Document management↑ Content-reflexive ↑ Description languages/1960↑ Document management/1960↑ Content-reflexive/1960↑ Description languages/France↑ Document management/France↑ Content-reflexive/France↑ Specialised Languages ↑ Specialised Languages/1960↑ Specialised Languages/fr ↑ SYNTOL(ID:2721/syn013)French IR languagealternate simple viewCountry: France Designed 1960 Published: 1962 Genus: Description languages Sammet category: Specialised Languages for SYNTagmatic Organization Language Semiotics-inspired language for the organization and retrieval of complex documents Jean-Claude Gardin CNRS 1960 Gardin was an archaeologist at the Archeological Documentation Centre at CNRS and developed SYNTOL from the need to catalogue the Middle East bronzes collection. In 1960 he got funding support from Euratom to turn it into a generalised language for automated indexing. Gardin based it on Saussure?s semiotics and distinguished between the semantic (paradigmatic) mode and the syntactic (syntagmatic, hence the name) mode of expression. It is a metalanguage for describing the relation between terms, rather than enumerating the terms themselves. ?It consists of a codified linguistic framework being used to represent the data, and of a whole of logical operations making it possible to store descriptions of documents and to find them.? (PBL 2003) ?SYNTOL specifies moreover two distinct groups of facets: Source and Sets of themes. In Source, the headings refer to physical attributes as the form, the language and the date; the Thematic facet includes the Beings (people or groups), the Topic (category of phenomena such as the relationship or the religion), Time (evokes events), Space (place where appear the people or the events) and the Mode (the general manner to tackle the subject: history, critical, etc). This terminology emphasizes the intention which inspired the analysis, as in the fundamental categories of Ranganathan, and this system influenced most of later research, in particular for the indexing of the archaeological objects.? (PBL 2003) Related languages
References: in Popplewell, Cicely M. (1962) Popplewell, Cicely M. (Ed.) Information Processing 62, Proceedings of the 2nd IFIP Congress, Munich, Aug. 1962. North Holland Publ. Co., 1963. in [ACM] (1963) ACM Computing Reviews 4(01) January-February, 1963 in [ACM] (1963) ACM Computing Reviews 4(01) January-February, 1963 in [ACM] (1963) ACM Computing Reviews 4(01) January-February, 1963 in [ACM] (1963) ACM Computing Reviews 4(01) January-February, 1963 in [ACM] (1963) ACM Computing Reviews 4(01) January-February, 1963 in (1973) Journal of Documentation, 29, 1973 in (1973) Journal of Documentation, 29, 1973 in (1995) Library Quarterly, 65(4) 1995 in (1995) Library Quarterly, 65(4) 1995 Resources Search in: Google Google scholar World Cat Yahoo Overture DBLP Monash bib NZ IEEE  ACM portal CiteSeer CSB ncstrl jstor Bookfinder |