MAGEN(ID:3113/mag001)

Matrix manipulation language 


for MAtrix GENerator (though possibly for the Magen David, the Star of David)

Larry Haverly of Haverly Systems


Related languages
MAGEN => MAGEN II   Evolution of
MAGEN => MaGen/PDS   Subset
MAGEN => PDS/MaGen   Subset

References:
  • Stock, Karl F. "A listing of some programming languages and their users" in RZ-Informationen. Graz: Rechenzentrum Graz 1971 146 view details Abstract: 321 Programmiersprachen mit Angabe der Computer-Hersteller, auf deren Anlagen die entsprechenden Sprachen verwendet werden kennen. Register der 74 Computer-Firmen; Reihenfolge der Programmiersprachen nach der Anzahl der Herstellerfirmen, auf deren Anlagen die Sprache implementiert ist; Reihenfolge der Herstellerfirmen nach der Anzahl der verwendeten Programmiersprachen.

    [321 programming languages with indication of the computer manufacturers, on whose machinery the appropriate languages are used to know.  Register of the 74 computer companies;  Sequence of the programming languages after the number of manufacturing firms, on whose plants the language is implemented;  Sequence of the manufacturing firms after the number of used programming languages.]
  • Sammet, Jean E., "Roster of Programming Languages 1972" 161 view details
          in Computers & Automation 21(6B), 30 Aug 1972 view details
  • Stock, Marylene and Stock, Karl F. "Bibliography of Programming Languages: Books, User Manuals and Articles from PLANKALKUL to PL/I" Verlag Dokumentation, Pullach/Munchen 1973 355 view details Abstract: PREFACE  AND  INTRODUCTION
    The exact number of all the programming languages still in use, and those which are no longer used, is unknown. Zemanek calls the abundance of programming languages and their many dialects a "language Babel". When a new programming language is developed, only its name is known at first and it takes a while before publications about it appear. For some languages, the only relevant literature stays inside the individual companies; some are reported on in papers and magazines; and only a few, such as ALGOL, BASIC, COBOL, FORTRAN, and PL/1, become known to a wider public through various text- and handbooks. The situation surrounding the application of these languages in many computer centers is a similar one.

    There are differing opinions on the concept "programming languages". What is called a programming language by some may be termed a program, a processor, or a generator by others. Since there are no sharp borderlines in the field of programming languages, works were considered here which deal with machine languages, assemblers, autocoders, syntax and compilers, processors and generators, as well as with general higher programming languages.

    The bibliography contains some 2,700 titles of books, magazines and essays for around 300 programming languages. However, as shown by the "Overview of Existing Programming Languages", there are more than 300 such languages. The "Overview" lists a total of 676 programming languages, but this is certainly incomplete. One author ' has already announced the "next 700 programming languages"; it is to be hoped the many users may be spared such a great variety for reasons of compatibility. The graphic representations (illustrations 1 & 2) show the development and proportion of the most widely-used programming languages, as measured by the number of publications listed here and by the number of computer manufacturers and software firms who have implemented the language in question. The illustrations show FORTRAN to be in the lead at the present time. PL/1 is advancing rapidly, although PL/1 compilers are not yet seen very often outside of IBM.

    Some experts believe PL/1 will replace even the widely-used languages such as FORTRAN, COBOL, and ALGOL.4) If this does occur, it will surely take some time - as shown by the chronological diagram (illustration 2) .

    It would be desirable from the user's point of view to reduce this language confusion down to the most advantageous languages. Those languages still maintained should incorporate the special facets and advantages of the otherwise superfluous languages. Obviously such demands are not in the interests of computer production firms, especially when one considers that a FORTRAN program can be executed on nearly all third-generation computers.

    The titles in this bibliography are organized alphabetically according to programming language, and within a language chronologically and again alphabetically within a given year. Preceding the first programming language in the alphabet, literature is listed on several languages, as are general papers on programming languages and on the theory of formal languages (AAA).
    As far as possible, the most of titles are based on autopsy. However, the bibliographical description of sone titles will not satisfy bibliography-documentation demands, since they are based on inaccurate information in various sources. Translation titles whose original titles could not be found through bibliographical research were not included. ' In view of the fact that nany libraries do not have the quoted papers, all magazine essays should have been listed with the volume, the year, issue number and the complete number of pages (e.g. pp. 721-783), so that interlibrary loans could take place with fast reader service. Unfortunately, these data were not always found.

    It is hoped that this bibliography will help the electronic data processing expert, and those who wish to select the appropriate programming language from the many available, to find a way through the language Babel.

    We wish to offer special thanks to Mr. Klaus G. Saur and the staff of Verlag Dokumentation for their publishing work.

    Graz / Austria, May, 1973
          in Computers & Automation 21(6B), 30 Aug 1972 view details
  • [Haverly ] MAGEN Reference Manual, Denville, NJ. Haverly Systems, 1977. view details
          in Computers & Automation 21(6B), 30 Aug 1972 view details
  • Greenberg Harvey J. "A Bibliography for the Development of An Intelligent Mathematical Programming System" in ITORMS 1(1) 1997 view details
          in Computers & Automation 21(6B), 30 Aug 1972 view details
  • "New LP" Hydrocarbon Asia, May/June 2004 view details Abstract: New technology is changing the face of Linear Programming. The New LP is non-linear withoutcompromise, reliably convergent, predictable, and no longer an isolated application but an integralpart of the business process. True cut-point optimisation is a convenient reality. With modernsoftware tools, the New LP is easier to learn and the results applicable to a wider audience.It is available to and used by more people within the refinery. In this paper, the virtues of the21st century LP application will be described, and its benefits discussed. Extract: MaGen
    Historical perspective  

    To appreciate the significant technical advances now available in 21st century LP systems, it is important to understand how refinery LP technology has evolved.  In 1947, George Danzig, a professor at Stanford University, developed the first linear programming algorithm. It was used on computers of that era to help solve troop supply problems during the Second World War. Since then, LP technology has been used in many different industries to solve myriad problems. Its use in the petroleum refining arena, however, is arguably responsible for the greatest advancements in this extraordinary technology.

    Early LPs were very difficult to create and interpret. Their input ?decks? were literally boxes of punch cards, each card specifying a particular matrix element. LP execution times typically ran into hours.  In the early 1960s, Larry Haverly developed a concept that revolutionised LP modelling.  Shortly thereafter, John Bonner, Joe Moore, and others followed with similar approaches. Haverly developed a computer language, appropriately named MaGen, which allowed for the automatic generation of an LP matrix from a logical array of recognisable data tables. MaGen was perhaps the first application of database technology in the computer industry.

          in Computers & Automation 21(6B), 30 Aug 1972 view details